Everyone in structured finance is familiar with it. Some believe it unlocks capital. Others think it replaces an SBLC. But very few truly understand its role, its limits, and its power when used correctly.

This guide will walk you through what an MT799 is, when it’s used, what it’s not, and how it fits within the larger SWIFT communication ecosystem, including the often-overlooked MT759.

If you’re involved in any SBLC-backed deal, project finance structure, or monetisation path, this is the clarity you’ve been looking for.

What Is an MT799?

An MT799 is a free-format SWIFT message sent between banks. It’s commonly used to transmit pre-advice, proof of funds, or a confirmation of readiness ahead of a formal financial action, such as the issuance of a Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC) or Bank Guarantee (BG).

It belongs to SWIFT’s Category 7 message types, which cover documentary credits and guarantees. However, MT799 has no fixed structure—it’s a custom-written text.

The bank is essentially saying:
“We’re aware of the transaction. We acknowledge the terms. We’re preparing to move.”

However, this message does not transfer money, does not create a legally binding obligation, and does not constitute a financial instrument.

When Do Real Banks Use MT799?

Over the years, I’ve seen MT799s used in legitimate ways inside serious deals. Here are the most common, appropriate scenarios:

• Pre-Advice of an Instrument
  Used to confirm that an SBLC or BG will be issued shortly. The bank lets the counterparty know to expect a formal MT760.
• Proof of Funds Communication
  To indicate the availability of client funds (though real POF is typically handled internally or through authenticated balance confirmations).
• Structured Finance Protocols
  In complex, high-value deals with multiple banks, escrow agents, or monetisers, an MT799 can serve as a sequencing mechanism to show readiness.
• Trade Finance Signals
  Before issuing a DLC (Documentary Letter of Credit), banks may use MT799 to confirm that conditions are being met.

The key theme? An MT799 always exists inside a larger structured deal. Never as a standalone tool.

What an MT799 Is Not

Let’s address this directly. Despite what some intermediaries claim:

• It does not represent a financial instrument
• It cannot be monetised on its own
• It does not obligate the bank to pay or issue anything
• It cannot replace a SWIFT MT760

If someone tells you an MT799 will unlock $50M just by being sent, you’re not looking at a deal. You’re looking at a stall.

MT799 vs MT760 vs MT759: What’s the Difference?

Here’s a simple breakdown to help you understand the real function of each message type:

• MT799: Sends a free-format message or pre-advice. Non-binding. Used for pre-advice, proof of funds, and readiness check before formal issuance.
• MT760: Issues a binding financial instrument. Legally binding. Used for issuance of SBLC, BG, DLC, or financial guarantee, at the time of instrument issuance.
• MT759: Acts as an update or amendment notice. Informational. Follows up on MT799 or MT760 with status updates, after MT799 or MT760.

More on MT759:
An MT759 is sent to confirm, amend, or update a previous message, typically the MT799 or MT760.

Think of it as the bank saying:
“We’re updating the terms.”
“This instrument is now active.”
“The conditions have changed.”

Few intermediaries talk about MT759, but in structured deals—especially those under compliance scrutiny—it’s a vital tracking tool.

Common Misconceptions Around MT799

• “An MT799 guarantees funding.”
  False. It only communicates readiness, not commitment.
• “You can monetise an MT799.”
  No. You monetise instruments, not communications.
• “You can use MT799 without KYC.”
  Not at any real bank. Full compliance is required before sending any SWIFT message.

How MT799 Fits Into a Real Deal

In my experience, successful deals follow this progression:

1. The parties agree on structure, instruments, and timing
2. Legal agreements are signed
3. Compliance and onboarding are completed
4. The issuing bank sends MT799 to confirm readiness
5. The beneficiary confirms receipt and SWIFT credentials
6. The issuing bank sends MT760 with the instrument
7. If needed, MT759 is used to amend or confirm final terms

This flow protects all parties and ensures the banks stay within their regulatory guardrails.

What You Should Do Before Requesting or Sending an MT799

Before anyone in your deal requests an MT799, ensure you have:

• A clearly defined project or transaction
• A signed agreement or term sheet
• Compliance documents already submitted to the issuing bank
• A scheduled MT760 (or reason for not sending it yet)
• A clear understanding of the purpose behind the message

If you can’t answer these questions, you’re not ready for any SWIFT messaging. And your deal may not be real.

Final Thoughts

An MT799 is a powerful tool when used within the proper structure.
Used correctly, it builds trust between counterparties.
Used carelessly, it wastes time and exposes everyone to risk.

If you’re being asked to provide or receive one, your next question shouldn’t be “Can we send it?”
It should be:
“Is this the next logical step in a bankable deal?”
If the answer isn’t clear, stop the deal and start with structure.

Book a Consultation: Build the Right Structure Before You Send the Right Message

At AltFunds Global, we help professionals navigate complex capital structures, instrument issuance, and SWIFT messaging.
We don’t just talk about MT799s.
We help you determine if you even need one, and what should come before and after.

Book your consultation today at http://www.altfundsglobal.com

Let’s get your capital strategy aligned before you start sending messages that mean nothing.

Because in real finance, clarity closes deals. Confusion kills them.